Acetazolamide in prevention of acute mountain sickness: A double-blind controlled cross-over study

77Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Twenty-four amateur climbers took part in a double-blind controlled cross-over trial of acetazolamide versus placebo for the prevention of acute mountain sickness. They climbed Kilimanjaro (5895 m) and Mt Kenya (5186 m) in three weeks with five rest days between ascents. The severity of acute mountain sickness was gauged by a score derived from symptoms recorded daily by each subject. On Kilimanjaro those taking acetazolamide reached a higher altitude (11 v 4 reached the summit) and had a lower symptom score than those taking placebo (mean 4.8 v 14.3). Those who had taken acetazolamide on Kilimanjaro maintained their low symptom scores while taking placebo on Mt Kenya (mean score 1–9), whereas those who had taken placebo on Kilimanjaro experienced a pronounced improvement when they took acetazolamide on Mt Kenya (mean score 2.5). Acute mountain sickness prevented one subject from completing either ascent. Acetazolamide was acceptable to 23 of the 24 subjects. Acetazolamide is recommended as an acceptable and effective prophylactic for acute mountain sickness. © 1981, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greene, M. K., Kerr, A. M., McIntosh, I. B., & Prescott, R. J. (1981). Acetazolamide in prevention of acute mountain sickness: A double-blind controlled cross-over study. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 283(6295), 811–813. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.283.6295.811

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free