Evaluation of joint medical and nursing notes with preprinted prompts

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To determine the views of doctors and nurses about two recent innovations in the structure of case notes: the use of preprinted prompts and the use of joint medical and nursing notes. Design - Questionnaire survey of all doctors and nurses working on the children's wards. Setting - Children's wards in a district general hospital. Main outcome measures - Whether or not respondents wanted to return to traditional notes; positive and negative aspects of the two innovations. Results - There was an 81% response rate. 45 of 48 respondents (94%) did not want to return to traditional notes. Positive features of joint notes that were identified included: promotes team work (21/48 respondents), improves access to information (14/48), and reduces duplication (14/48). Negative features included uncertainty about identity of writer (8/48) and incompletely filled in sheets (7/48). Positive features of preprinted prompts included: less information omitted (29/48), easier to read and find information (28/ 48), and quicker to write (21/48). Negative features included: not enough space (19/ 48) and clerking too mechanical (16/48). Conclusion - Advantages of both innovations outweighed their disadvantages to the extent that only three out of 48 respondents wanted to return to writing traditional notes. (Quality in Health Care 1997;6:192-193).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robins, A., Gallagher, A., Rossiter, M. A., & Lloyd, B. W. (1997). Evaluation of joint medical and nursing notes with preprinted prompts. Quality and Safety in Health Care. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.6.4.192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free