Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: An update

22Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A review is made of the publications on the marginal bone loss of implants with a polished neck, rough neck with micro threading, and rough neck without micro threading. A Pub Med search was carried out with the following key words: machined neck implant, polished neck implant, marginal bone loss, covering the period between January 1998 and March 2009. Inclusion was limited to those human clinical studies involving a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and registering the level of bone loss from the time of placement of the implant or prosthetic restoration to the end of follow-up. For most of the authors there were no significant differences in marginal bone loss between polished neck and rough neck implants. On the other hand, implants with a rough neck and micro threading showed significantly less bone loss than those with a polished neck or with a rough neck without micro threading. The survival rate of the implants with a polished neck ranged from 87% to 97.7%, versus 94.5% to 100% for those with a rough neck, and 100% for the rough neck implants with micro threading. No peri-implant disease was registered in the different studies. © Medicina Oral S.L.C.I.F.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aloy-Prósper, A., Maestre-Ferrín, L., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2011). Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: An update. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 16(3), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e365

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free