Risk associated with central catheters for malignant tumor patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The risk of venous thrombosis and mortality associated with central catheter (PICC/CICC) for malignant tumor patients is not definite. So, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate it. Among patients with comparing PICC with CICC, odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) was calculated with a random effect model meta-analysis. The result of the stratification analysis of 7 studies (PICC vs CICC) supported the theory that CICCs were associated with a decrease in the odds ratio of thrombosis compared with PICCs. 7 of 15 studies provided the information about the compared mortality rate of the patients. The result showed that CICCs were associated with a decrease in the odds ratio of thrombosis compared with PICCs (OR = 0.45, 95% CI:0.32-0.62, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%,Tau2 = 0.00). Meta-analysis of 8 studies of 2639 patients showed that pharmacological deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis drugs could decrease the risk of mortality of malignant tumor patients with CICCs (RR = 0.58, 95% CI:0.48-0.71, Z = 5.32, p < 0.0001, I2 =71%). We found that PICCs are associated with a raised risk of deep vein thrombosis, and pharmacological deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis drugs is a beneficial factor in decreasing the incidence of thrombosis, while warfarin may decrease the risk of mortality of malignant tumor patients with CICCs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lv, Y., Hou, Y., Pan, B., Ma, Y., Li, P., Yu, L., … Tian, Y. (2018). Risk associated with central catheters for malignant tumor patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget, 9(15), 12376–12388. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free