Caries prevalence in skeletal series - Is it possible to compare?

12Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of the relationship with subsistence, dental caries is a central issue in paleopathological research. Usually, comparisons between caries prevalence exhibited in different skeletal series are made. Dietary variation is the most common explanation for cavities prevalence. The aim of this paper is to verify if it is possible to compare caries prevalence reported on papers for archaeological skeletal series. Another goal is to determine if other factors besides diet are implicated in dental cavity prevalence explanation. Twenty six papers about dental health with caries prevalences published from 1999 to 2004 were analyzed for completeness. This assessment includes carious lesion diagnosis and characteristics, age, sex and size characteristics of samples, and prevalence calculation method. The majority of the analyzed papers do not provide adequate information in the topics listed above. Only very few implicated factors other than diet as a contributor to caries lesions development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wesolowski, V. (2006). Caries prevalence in skeletal series - Is it possible to compare? In Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Vol. 101, pp. 139–145). Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762006001000021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free