Comparisons of performance between quantum-enhanced and classical machine learning algorithms on the IBM Quantum Experience

30Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Machine learning is now widely used almost everywhere, primarily for forecasting. In the broadest sense, the machine learning objective may be summarized as an approximation problem, and the issues solved by various training methods can be reduced to finding the optimal value of an unknown function or restoring a function. At the moment, we have only experimental samples of quantum computers based on classical-quantum logic, when quantum gates are used instead of ordinary logic gates, and probabilistic quantum bits are used instead of deterministic bits. Namely, the probabilistic nature problems that provide for the determination of a certain optimal state from a large set of possible ones on which quantum computers can achieve "quantum supremacy"-an extraordinary (by many orders of magnitude) reduction in the time required to solve the task. The main idea of the work is to identify the possibility of achieving, if not quantum supremacy, then at least a quantum advantage when solving machine learning problems on a quantum computer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zahorodko, P. V., Semerikov, S. O., Soloviev, V. N., Striuk, A. M., Striuk, M. I., & Shalatska, H. M. (2021). Comparisons of performance between quantum-enhanced and classical machine learning algorithms on the IBM Quantum Experience. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1840). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free