The Impact of Sketch-guided vs. Prompt-guided 3D Generative AIs on the Design Exploration Process

35Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Various modalities have emerged in the field of 3D generative AI (GenAI) to enhance design outcomes. While some designers find inspiration in prompts to guide their design options, others prefer sketching to embody creative visions. Nonetheless, the impact of the different modalities of 3D GenAI on the design process remains largely unexplored. This study examines the utilization of prompt- and sketch-guided modalities within the design process by conducting linkography and workflow analyses with 12 designers. The results revealed that prompts played a pivotal role in stimulating initial ideation, whereas sketches played a crucial role in embodying design ideas. This investigation highlights the distinct contributions of these modalities at different phases of the design process, suggesting the potential for a more refined and synergistic collaboration between humans and AI. By elucidating the diverse functions of sketches and prompts, we propose prospective directions for the UX framework of the 3D GenAI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S. W., Jo, T. H., Jin, S., Choi, J., Yun, K., Bromberg, S., … Hyun, K. H. (2024). The Impact of Sketch-guided vs. Prompt-guided 3D Generative AIs on the Design Exploration Process. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free