Correction: Exploring barriers and facilitators to increase the engagement with a digital app (OLIO) for food/non-food sustainable consumption in citizens from Bogotá, Colombia (Current Psychology, (2024), 10.1007/s12144-024-06219-7)

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The original version of this article contains errors. The authors affiliation has been updated to Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London (UCL), UK. Also, In Table 2 of this article, the data under the References column were mistakenly converted to a references citation instead of having them in a number format as it refers to the times the word was expressed by interviewees. The correct Table 2 is shown below. Specific barriers and facilitators to engage with OLIO app related to COM-B components Themes on specific barriers/facilitators Barrier/Facilitator Description References COM-B Component Fear of malicious users Barrier Afraid of being mugged by the collector or donor 17 Automatic motivation Uncertainty about what OLIO owners do with users’ personal information Barrier Afraid of sharing too much personal info over the app 8 Little incentives for donors Barrier Little room for incentives to encourage donations 12 The understanding of the app functionality Barrier A lack of clarity on how the app works 7 Psychological capability OLIO is a tool aimed at poor people Barrier The belief that Olio is mainly to help people in need 4 There are more collectors than donors Barrier Users care more about collecting than donating 8 Social opportunity Communication problems among users Barrier Some users show little respect or are rude to other users 3 Notifications of new items take a long time to be received Barrier The app does not send alerts on the new items immediately after they are published 9 Physical opportunity Few users around the neighborhood Barrier Users need to travel long distances to collect items given the few people using the app 10 Having prosocial values Facilitator Someone who likes sharing/helping others or has empathic concerns 20 Reflective motivation Perceived social and personal benefits Facilitator Positive outcomes on individuals/others, generated using Olio 18 Satisfaction while helping those in need Facilitator A feeling of pleasure derived from helping others 16 Automatic motivation Satisfaction when checking that the app works as promised Facilitator A feeling of pleasure when a favourable outcome occurs after using the app 13 Ratings contributes to the users’ trust and confidence Facilitator Ratings is a source of information about Olio users’ behaviour 8 Social opportunity The more people using the app the more influence to use it Facilitator The widespread use of Olio contributes to its reliability 15 Offers an easier way to share items Facilitator Olio provides the opportunity to reach people with specific needs, and to save efforts when sharing 9 The original article has been updated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ceballos, A. M. G., & Antonopoulou, V. (2024, September 1). Correction: Exploring barriers and facilitators to increase the engagement with a digital app (OLIO) for food/non-food sustainable consumption in citizens from Bogotá, Colombia (Current Psychology, (2024), 10.1007/s12144-024-06219-7). Current Psychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06342-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free