Risk factors for recanalization after coil embolization

Abstract

The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for recanalization 6 months after coil embolization using clinical data followed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis. Meth-ods: Firstly, clinical data of 184 patients treated with coil embolization were analyzed retrospec-tively. Secondly, aneurysm models for high/low recanalization risk were generated based on ROC curves and their cut-off points. Afterward, CFD was utilized to validate the results. Results: In mul-tivariable analysis, aneurysm filling during the first embolization was an independent risk factor whilst packing density was a protective factor of recanalization after 6 months in patients with aSAH. For patients with unruptured aneurysms, packing density was found to be a protective factor whilst the aneurysm neck size was an independent risk factor. Complex flow pattern and multiple vortices were associated with aneurysm shape and were characteristic of the high recanalization risk group. Conclusions: Statistical analysis suggested that there are various factors influencing re-canalization risk. Once certain values of morphometric parameters are exceeded, a complex flow with numerous vortices occurs. This phenomenon was revealed due to CFD investigations that val-idated our statistical research. Thus, the complex flow pattern itself can be treated as a relevant recanalization predictor.