Qualidade de vida de pacientes hipertensos em tratamento ambulatorial

24Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The main cause of mortality in braziliam population is the cardiovascular disease and arterial hypertension (AH) the most prevalent one. The antihypertensive treatment is effective however it is not well known how affects the quality of life (QOL) in patients afterwards. Objective: To comparatively assess the QOL in patients submitted to an antihypertensive treatment. Methods: One-hundred patients with AH were studied of which 46 had complied with a standard treatment regimen (group A) and 54 (group B control) were about to start the same regimen. We collected clinical and sociodemographic data and questions focusing sexuality, self-perception of QOL, number and types of medication taken and their influence on sex life. The questionnaire SF-36 was also administered. The data were analyzed using the tests chi-square, Student's t, Pearson correlation and Tukey. Results: No differences were detected between group A and B in any of the SF-36 domains. There was an association between the question on self-perception of QOL and the SF-36 domains, emotional aspects excepted. As regards sexuality, there was difference in the quality of sex life between the groups, which was less satisfactory for group A. Conclusion: When the SF-36 was administered no changes in QOL were detected between the groups because it is an asymptomatic chronic disease. The SF-36 did not properly assess emotional aspects in our case series of hypertensive patients that had high behavior variability. Group A showed lower quality sex life; however, this was not related to the number and type of medication used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cavalcante, M. A., Bombig, M. T. N., Luna Filho, B., Carvalho, A. C. D. C., De Paola, A. A. V., & Póvoa, R. (2007). Qualidade de vida de pacientes hipertensos em tratamento ambulatorial. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 89(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2007001600006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free