Case report: non-extraction treatment with functional and mechanical therapy of a Class II division 1 malocclusion.

0Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-extraction treatment was carried out for a growing Angle Class II division 1 patient. Because the patient demonstrated potential growth and all the third molars were congenitally missing, the extraction of the four premolars was ruled out. A functional appliance (MGA) and cervical headgear were employed simultaneously in the first phase of treatment. The second phase was carried out by mechanotherapy. As a result, adequate forward growth of the mandible was attained and all 28 teeth were kept in good relation with no root resorption and healthy periodontal tissue. A better improvement of the profile may have been attained had extraction treatment been performed; with non-extraction treatment, however, the amount of tooth movement could be minimized, and root resorption was not observed. The role of the functional appliance is also important for the success of non-extraction treatment in Class II patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murakami, T., Moro, N., & Abe, K. (1997). Case report: non-extraction treatment with functional and mechanical therapy of a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Australian Orthodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-1997-0004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free