A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the suggestive effect of anxiety management questionnaires in dental emergencies

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Dental anxiety is widespread among both children and adults. To diagnose dental anxiety, standardized anxiety questionnaires are recommended. Based on the suggestive nature of the questionnaires, the study aimed to find out whether asking respondents about personal coping strategies before dental treatment influences their anxiety. Methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial included a total of 158 patients of a university dental clinic on emergency service. The intervention group (n = 82) received the Coping with Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) and the control group (n = 76) the Hierarchical Anxiety Questionnaire (HAF). State anxiety scores were assessed by using the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before and after the completion of each questionnaire. Results: Anxiety decreased in the intervention group (CAQ) (p < 0.001) and increased in the control group (HAF) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the current study, a diagnostic tool of a standardized questionnaire for the assessment to assess personal coping strategies decreased state anxiety in comparison to a questionnaire assessing anxiety. Clinical trial registration: https://www.drks.de, German Trials Register (DRKS00032450).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benz, C. I., Wolanski, C., Piefke, M., Campus, G., Piwowarczyk, A., & Wolf, T. G. (2024). A double-blind randomized clinical trial on the suggestive effect of anxiety management questionnaires in dental emergencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1333594

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free