The "retrofitting" approach to adapting evidence-based interventions: A case study of pediatric asthma care coordination, United States, 2010-2014

1Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Adaptation of evidence-based interventions upon implementation into new practice settings is universal, yet poorly understood. During a cross-site evaluation of the implementation of a proven intervention for pediatric asthma care coordination into 4 resourcechallenged settings, we conducted in-depth interviews with site representatives, who reported how and why they modified intervention components. Interview notes were coded for themes. We focused on a single theme from a respondent who described the adaptation process as "backing" the intervention into ongoing services; we found evidence of a similar process at other sites. We labeled this process "retrofitting" to signify adaptation that consists of altering existing services to align with intervention components, rather than modifying the intervention to fit a new setting. Advantages of retrofitting may include allowing organizations to keep what works, capitalizing on existing support for program activities, elevating the role of local knowledge, and potentially promoting the sustainability of effective innovations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janevic, M. R., Stoll, S. C., Lara, M., Ramos-Valencia, G., Bryant-Stephens, T., Persky, V., … Malveaux, F. J. (2016). The “retrofitting” approach to adapting evidence-based interventions: A case study of pediatric asthma care coordination, United States, 2010-2014. Preventing Chronic Disease, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free