Improvement in Activities of Daily Living after Cataract Surgery in the Very Old

  • Hiratsuka Y
  • Michihata N
  • Jo T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of cataract surgery for patients aged ≥90 years in terms of improvements in activities of daily living (ADL) have been poorly evaluated using only limited data. Using a large nationwide administrative database of hospitalized patients, we investigated the improvement of ADL after cataract surgery in the very old (age of ≥90 years). METHODS: We identified 84,747 patients with cataracts aged 80 to 89 years and 7,253 patients with cataracts aged ≥90 years who underwent cataract surgery in both eyes during hospitalization from April 2014 to March 2015. A retrospective matched-pair cohort study was performed to compare the proportion of patients with improved ADL after cataract surgery. We also compared the length of hospital stay between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients aged ≥90 years were more likely to be female and have a lower ADL score at admission. In the 1:4 matched-pair analysis with 7,253 versus 29,012 pairs, a lower proportion of patients aged ≥90 years had an improved ADL score (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.36; P < 0.001) even after adjusting for other variables. Patients aged ≥90 years had a slightly shorter length of hospital stay than those aged 80 to 89 years (7.5 vs. 8.2 days, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide cohort of patients with cataracts, those aged ≥90 years showed significantly poorer improvement of ADL than did patients aged 80 to 89 years. Cataract surgery before the age of 90 years may be recommended for patients with cataracts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hiratsuka, Y., Michihata, N., Jo, T., Matsui, H., Inoue, A., Murakami, A., … Yasunaga, H. (2021). Improvement in Activities of Daily Living after Cataract Surgery in the Very Old. Annals of Clinical Epidemiology, 3(4), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.37737/ace.3.4_109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free