A more reliable design for biodiversity study?

  • Wardle D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Naeem and Li 1 present the results of a microcosm study in which species diversity of organisms within trophic groups was varied. They conclude that the existence of multiple species within these groups enhanced the "reliability" of these systems, that is, the increased likelihood of a consistent level of performance over a given unit of time. But there are problems with their study. For the least diverse communities, one predator species was randomly selected from a selection of two, one autotroph from a selection of three, one consumer of bacteria from a selection of five, and one omnivore from a selection of six. Meanwhile, with the most diverse communities, both predator species and all three autotroph species were used, three consumer bacteria were chosen from the five and three omnivores from the six.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wardle, D. A. (1998). A more reliable design for biodiversity study? Nature, 394(6688), 30–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/27812

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free