The politics of the surgical mask: Challenging the biomedical episteme during a pandemic

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

COVID-19 has seen politicians use a selective ‘science’ to justify restrictions on mobility and association, to mandate the wearing of face masks, and to close public infrastructure. There seems to be no role for health humanities scholars as yet, but perhaps there should be. This paper considers the fate of a health humanities article on surgical mask use that was published in a biomedical journal in 2016. This article, which did not operate from within the biomedical episteme but which was in conversation with the episteme, was misappropriated on both sides of the political spectrum to justify personal beliefs around mask use in the pandemic. This mistaken misappropriation is not only evidence of the utility of the common ground shared between biomedicine and the health humanities, it is also evidence of the possibilities inherent in a future interdisciplinary involving biomedicine and the health humanities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neilson, S. (2022). The politics of the surgical mask: Challenging the biomedical episteme during a pandemic. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 28(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13590

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free