The clinical application of genetic testing in type 2 diabetes: A patient and physician survey

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Advances in type 2 diabetes genetics have raised hopes that genetic testing will improve disease prediction, prevention and treatment. Little is known about current physician and patient views regarding type 2 diabetes genetic testing. We hypothesised that physician and patient views would differ regarding the impact of genetic testing on motivation and adherence. Methods: We surveyed a nationally representative sample of US primary care physicians and endocrinologists (n=304), a random sample of non-diabetic primary care patients (n=152) and patients enrolled in a diabetes pharmacogenetics study (n=89). Results: Physicians and patients favoured genetic testing for diabetes risk prediction (79% of physicians vs 80% of non-diabetic patients would be somewhat/very likely to order/request testing, p=0.7). More patients than physicians (71% vs 23%, p<0.01) indicated that a 'high risk' result would be very likely to improve motivation to adopt preventive lifestyle changes. Patients favoured genetic testing to guide therapy (78% of patients vs 48% of physicians very likely to request/recommend testing, p<0.01) and reported that genetic testing would make them 'much more motivated' to adhere to medications (72% vs 18% of physicians, p<0.01). Many physicians (39%) would be somewhat/very likely to order genetic testing before published evidence of clinical efficacy. Conclusions/interpretation: Despite the paucity of current data, physicians and patients reported high expectations that genetic testing would improve patient motivation to adopt key behaviours for the prevention or control of type 2 diabetes. This suggests the testable hypothesis that 'genetic' risk information might have greater value to motivate behaviour change compared with standard risk information. © 2009 Springer-Verlag.