A comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for prophylaxis against aspiration pneumonitis in emergency Caesarean section

33Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One hundred and sixty‐two Chinese women undergoing emergency Caesarean section were allocated at random on admission to the labour ward to receive one of three regimens for orally administered chemoprophylaxis against acid aspiration: ranitidine 150 mg 6 hourly with sodium citrate at induction of anaesthesia, omeprazole 40 mg 12 hourly with sodium citrate, or omeprazole 40 mg 12 hourly alone. Intragastric pH and volume were measured immediately after induction of anaesthesia. Ten patients (17%) in the omeprazole‐only group, three (6%) in the omeprazole and citrate group and one (2%) in the ranitidine group had an intragastric pH < 2.5 and volume > 25 ml (p < 0.05). The use of sodium citrate resulted in higher intragastric pH but larger intragastric volumes (p < 0.05). The sodium citrate and ranitidine regimen was the most cost‐effective among the three. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

YAU, G., KAN, A. F., GIN, T., & OH, T. E. (1992). A comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for prophylaxis against aspiration pneumonitis in emergency Caesarean section. Anaesthesia, 47(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02002.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free