Antibiogram Sensitivity of Bacterial Organisms Identified from Surgical and Non-surgical Wounds of Animal

  • R. R
  • Khan T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Eight different antibiotics were used against bacterial species. The antibiotics were tetracycline, ampicillin, gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, baquiloprim sulphadimidine, chloramphenicol and sulphamethoxazole trimethoprim. The species and their percent of sensitivity to tetracycline were: Streptococcus pyogenes (80%), Streptococcus uberis (73.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (80%), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (73.3%) and Micrococcus luteus (73,3%). Whereas Streptococcus intermedius (80%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (73.3%) and Stomatococcus mucilaginous (80%) were highly sensitive to ampicillin only. The species Streptococcus pyogenes (73.3%). Proteus vulgaris (100%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (86.6%), Micrococcus luteus (93.3%) and Stomatococcus mucilaginous (86.6%) showed sensitivity to chloramphenicol. Other species recorded highly sensitive to Sulphamethoxazole trimethoprim were: Streptococcus pyogenes (100%). Streptococcus uberis (80%), Staphylococcus aureus (73.3%), Corynebacterium diphtheriae (73.3%), Corynebacterium pyogenes (73.3%), Proteus vulgaris 173.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (80%), Micrococcus luteus (86.6%) and Stomatococcus mucilaginous (100%) respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

R., R., & Khan, T. S. (2000). Antibiogram Sensitivity of Bacterial Organisms Identified from Surgical and Non-surgical Wounds of Animal. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(10), 1719–1723. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.1719.1723

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free