Collaborative Evaluation for the Utah All Payer Claims Database Capacity Enhancement

  • Garvin J
  • Cardwell J
  • Doing-Harris K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a process to evaluate the continuing development of All Payer Claims Databases (APCDs) using a collaborative evaluation process. Project teams enhanced the Utah APCD with improved analytic capacity to provide online pricing and cost-transparency reports to support health care reform in Utah. Our program evaluation efforts added key methods and tools, building on recommendations in the APCD Development Manual to provide evaluation data facilitating improvements [1]. These additions included a Collaborative Evaluation Model, logic models, and development and use of best practices as measures. Stakeholders found that the added use of best practices, logic models, and frequent feedback to practitioners facilitated the project’s success. Since the Collaborative Evaluation Model served a structural purpose, it was transparent to the project teams.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garvin, J. H., Cardwell, J. H., Doing-Harris, K., Bolton, D., Snow, L. A., Hawley, C. W., & Xu, W. (2018). Collaborative Evaluation for the Utah All Payer Claims Database Capacity Enhancement. Technology and Investment, 09(02), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2018.92007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free