The ghost in the machine is the elephant in the room: Souls, death, and harm at the end of life

5Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The idea that we human beings have souls that can continue to have conscious experiences after the deaths of our bodies is controversial in contemporary academic bioethics; this idea is obviously present whenever questions about harm at the end of life are discussed, but this idea is often ignored or avoided because it is more comfortable to do so. After briefly discussing certain types of experiences that lead some people to believe in souls that can survive the deaths of their bodies, I begin to answer the question, "If personal postmortem survival of some sort is real, then how should this alter the way we approach our bioethical discussions about death, the harm of death, and harming the dead?" The bioethics issues I briefly discuss in the remaining two sections are the debate about defining death and the decision whether to forego life-prolonging treatments. © 2012 The Author.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Disilvestro, R. (2012). The ghost in the machine is the elephant in the room: Souls, death, and harm at the end of life. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom), 37(5), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhs037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free