Role of abrasion of the femoral component in revision knee arthroplasty

17Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We carried out 60 revision procedures for failed porous coated anatomic total knee replacements in 54 patients, which were divided into two groups. The 14 knees in group I had a well-fixed femoral component at surgery which was retained, and in the 46 knees in group II both tibial and femoral components were loose and were revised using a variety of implants. Our review comprised clinical and radiological assessment. A total of 13 knees required a second revision. Six (42%) in group I failed very early (mean 2.1 years) when compared with seven (15%) in group II (mean 6.8 years). Failure was due to wear of the polyethylene insert by the abraded, retained femoral component (crude odds ratio 4.07; 95% CI 1.07 to 15.5). We recommend a complete change of primary bearing surfaces at the time of revision of an uncemented total knee replacement in order to prevent early wear of polyethylene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siddique, M. S., Rao, M. C., Deehan, D. J., & Pinder, I. M. (2003). Role of abrasion of the femoral component in revision knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 85(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.13041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free