Abstract
In our paper, the calculated complex relative permittivity values are erroneous. The corrected data is inserted in the Abstract, main text, figure 4(a), and used in the corresponding simulation, which is also refined and replotted in figure 5. K dielectric permittivity (ϵr= 1.183 ± 0.006 at 300 GHz and ϵr= 1.157 ± 0.012 at 2.0 THz) and K Results and discussion Kϵris lightly decreasing with frequency from 1.199 ± 0.005 at 100 GHz to 1.157 ± 0.012 at 2.0 THz, whereas tan δ scatters around 0.012 ± 0.002 in the measured K In addition, we have noticed an inconsistency in the sentence: 'K the anticipated attenuation of 36.8% (i.e. 1-e-1), which is probably due to K' which should read as 'K the anticipated attenuation of 63.2% (i.e. 1-e-1), which is probably due to K' Furthermore, the page number and the hyperlink in [4] is incorrect, which should be 19891 not 1-9. (doi: 10.1038/srep19891).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pálvölgyi, P. S., Nelo, M., Pitkänen, O., Peräntie, J., Liimatainen, H., Myllymäki, S., … Kordas, K. (2022, September 10). Erratum: Ultra-low permittivity porous silica-cellulose nanocomposite substrates for 6G telecommunication (Nanotechnology (2020) 31 (435203) DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aba4cc). Nanotechnology. Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac75f6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.