Impact of compliance on quit rates in a smoking cessation intervention: population study in Denmark

  • Ghith N
  • Ammari A
  • Rasmussen M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives Primary objective was to evaluate whether patients completing at least 75% of the smoking cessation program had a higher quit rate after 6 months than patients participating in less than 75% of the program. Secondary objective was to evaluate whether there might be a more appropriate compliance level than 75%. Methods The study included all patients (17,439) who participated in the National Gold Standard Smoking Cessation Program in Denmark (GSP) with planned follow-up for smoking cessation at 6 months. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (datasets) in order to investigate and re-validate the objectives on two separated groups of smokers. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken for non-responders. Results Patients who completed at least 75% of the program sessions had higher quit rates in comparison to patients who completed less than 75% of the program (OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.24 - 0.31 and 0.31; 0.27 - 0.35) for the first and second dataset, respectively. However patients who completed the whole program had higher quit rates compared to patients completing only 75% (0.49; 0.43 - 0.56, and 0.54; 0.47 - 0.62, respectively). The sensitivity analysis showed that baseline characteristics were similar between patients with missing and available follow-up data. Conclusion Compliance to 75% of the national smoking cessation program (GSP) is shown to be effective; however, 100% compliance leads to even higher quit rates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghith, N., Ammari, A. B. H., Rasmussen, M., Frølich, A., Cooper, K., & Tønnesen, H. (2012). Impact of compliance on quit rates in a smoking cessation intervention: population study in Denmark. Clinical Health Promotion - Research and Best Practice for Patients, Staff and Community, 2(3), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.29102/clinhp.12017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free