Cervical cancer outcome prediction to high-dose rate brachytherapy using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of tumor response to external beam radiotherapy

36Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and purpose In order to assess tumor regression and outcomes, a volumetric analysis was conducted for cervical cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT). Materials and methods Consecutive patients with FIGO stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer receiving chemoradiation from 2007 to 2013 were identified, excluding patients with perineal template-based interstitial brachytherapy or without undergoing MRI. A ring and tandem applicator ± interstitial needles was used. T2-weighted imaging was completed following applicator insertion. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were retrospectively contoured: initial GTV (GTVPre-EBRT), GTV at first brachytherapy (GTVIGBT) and percent residual GTV at first brachytherapy (% GTVResidual). Results Eighty-four patients were identified. With 20.8-month median follow-up, two-year estimates of local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 91.3, 79.8, and 85.0%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression revealed adenocarcinoma (HR 5.88, p = 0.03) and GTVIGBT (HR 1.17, p < 0.01) as predictors for local failure. GTVIGBT > 7.5 cc was associated with inferior 2-year LC (75.0 vs. 96.6%, p < 0.01), DFS (42.6 vs. 91.6%, p < 0.01) and OS (65.2 vs. 91.5%, p < 0.01). No difference in mean HRCTV D90 EQD2 was seen between the groups (p = 0.61). Conclusion Aside from known benefits of IGBT, MRI-based planning allows for assessment of tumor regression and prognosticates patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Minkoff, D., Gill, B. S., Kang, J., & Beriwal, S. (2015). Cervical cancer outcome prediction to high-dose rate brachytherapy using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of tumor response to external beam radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 115(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.03.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free