Conciliar trinitarianism, divine identity claims, and subordination

20Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, I present the trinitarian teaching of the first seven ecumenical councils, what we might call Conciliar Trinitarianism. I then consider two questions. First, what is the relationship between the divine persons and the divine nature? I argue that neither strict identity nor instantiation interpretations of that relationship fit well with the conciliar texts. Second, does the relation of procession among the divine persons, asserted in the conciliar texts, imply an objectionable ontological subordination in the Trinity? I argue that there is at least one way for a proponent of Conciliar Trinitarianism to deny that objectionable ontological subordination follows from the divine processions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pawl, T. (2020). Conciliar trinitarianism, divine identity claims, and subordination. TheoLogica, 4(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14428/thl.v4i2.23593

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free