Abstract
Ernest Gellner's work on nationalism is situated in a larger social metaphysic and philosophical anthropology. This paper investigates some of these overarching intellectual commitments and their implications for his arguments about nationalism. Two main issues are examined. Does the method of 'philosophic history' provide any philosophical or methodological support for his treatment of nationalism? What are the implications of the common culture of industrial civilization for his arguments about nationalism? Addressing these issues together contributes to the continuing evaluation of Gellner's work, particularly to recent discussion of his arguments about necessity and nationalism.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Meadwell, H. (2015). Philosophic history and common culture in Gellner’s theory of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 21(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12082
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.