Guideline-based statin eligibility, coronary artery stenosis and cardiovascular events in patients with stable chest pain: A secondary analysis of the promise randomized clinical trial

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Recommendations for preventive statin treatment in patients with stable chest pain may be difficult as symptoms can be unspecific. It is unclear if coronary CT angiography (CTA)-detected coronary artery disease (CAD) can optimize statin prescription. Methods: In stable chest pain patients randomized to CTA in the PROMISE trial, statin eligibility was defined per 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina over 26 months median follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) of non-obstructive (1–69% stenosis) and obstructive (≥70% stenosis) CAD for events were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. Calculated HR were then incorporated into the ACC/AHA pooled cohort equation (PCE) to revised ASCVD risk and assess re-classification of statin eligibility. Results: Among 3986 patients (60.5 ± 8.2 years; 51% female), 72.9% (2904/3986) were statin eligible. Event rates in statin-eligible vs. ineligible patients were 3.3% vs. 2.3% (HR = 1.4 (95% CI 0.9–2.2), p = 0.142). Although the proportion of statin-eligible patients increased with CAD severity, 54% without CAD were statin eligible. Incorporating information on CAD into PCE reclassified 12.7% of patients (1.3% towards statin, 11.4% towards no statin). Similar results were found in stratified analysis of statin naïve patients (reclassification of 13.9%, 1.0% towards statin, and 12.9% towards no statin). As a result, revised ASCVD risk improved model discrimination in all patients (c-statistic: 0.59 (95 %CI 0.55–0.62) vs. 0.52 (95 %CI 0.49–0.56); p < 0.001), while reducing statin use by 10.1% (62.7% vs. 72.9% statin eligible, p < 0.001). Conclusion: In stable chest pain patients, integration of CAD into guideline recommendations was associated with greater accuracy to reclassify those at increased risk for incident events and a more efficient use of statins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pursnani, A., Taron, J., Mayrhofer, T., Lu, M. T., Ferencik, M., Ladapo, J. A., … Hoffmann, U. (2020). Guideline-based statin eligibility, coronary artery stenosis and cardiovascular events in patients with stable chest pain: A secondary analysis of the promise randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free