Abstract
As much as we might laud the intellectual contribution of James MacGregor Burns to the field of leadership studies, he would be very disappointed if his work did not spur conflict and challenges. Consequently, this article points out puzzles and paradoxes in Burns's work and suggest elements of a new paradigm. Those elements include leaving behind the leader-centrism that haunts Burns's work and clarifying the leadership role, in contrast to followership, of all members of a group.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Couto, R. A. (2015). Puzzles, paradoxes, and paradigms: the intellectual legacy of James MacGregor Burns. Leadership and the Humanities, 3(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.4337/lath.2015.01.03
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.