Memory is no longer what it used to be

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In Difference and Repetition, Gilles Deleuze develops a philosophy of time that allows three different conceptualizations of memory: memory conceived from the present, memory from the past and memory from the future.1 According to Deleuze, in any human being there is always an interplay between these different ways of conceiving memory and time more generally. On a more collective cultural level, however, I propose that we have moved into new dominant way of understanding memory: In the twenty-first century we increasingly conceive memory from the point of view of possible futures. In contemporary cinema, as well as elsewhere in culture, memory is no longer what it used to be.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pisters, P. (2016). Memory is no longer what it used to be. In Memory in the Twenty-First Century: New Critical Perspectives from the Arts, Humanities, and Sciences (pp. 213–217). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137520586_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free