A changing economic vote in Western Europe? Long-term vs. short-term forces

20Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Considerable research shows the presence of an economic vote, with governments rewarded or punished by voters, depending on the state of the economy. But how stable is this economic vote? A current argument holds its effect has increased over time, because of weakening long-term social and political forces. Under these conditions, short-term forces, foremostly the economic issue, can come to the fore. A counter-argument, however, sees the economic vote effect in decline, due to globalization. Against these rival hypotheses rests the status-quo argument: The economic vote effect remains unchanged. To test these claims, we estimate carefully specified models of the incumbent vote, at both the individual and aggregate levels. Western European elections provide the data, with particular attention to Denmark, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. Perhaps surprisingly, we find the economic vote to be stable over time, a 'standing decision' rule that voters follow in national elections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dassonneville, R., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2019). A changing economic vote in Western Europe? Long-term vs. short-term forces. In European Political Science Review (Vol. 11, pp. 91–108). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free