Impactos de desastres socioambientais em saúde pública: Estudos dos casos dos Estados de Santa Catarina em 2008 e Pernambuco em 2010

14Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Events such as floods and landslides can cause disasters that affect Brazilian public health extensively. Impacts include traumas and injuries, damage to water treatment plants and hospitals, disruption of equipment and medicine supply, epidemics and the spread of diseases, as well as lasting psychosocial damage. In this article, we study disaster scenarios in municipalities from two Brazilian states that had declared a state of public calamity as a result of flooding – Santa Catarina (2008) and Pernambuco (2010). The object was to identify and analyze the impacts of these disasters on social and environmental conditions as well as on the coverage of public health. To this purpose, the before and after disaster situation in affected municipalities was analyzed. To characterize socio-environmental vulnerability, we used data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), the Brazilian Geological Survey (CPRM), the National Protection and Civil Defense Secretariat (SEDEC) and the Health Ministry. Although there are expressive differences between the two investigated states, especially in regards to social indicators, both of them suffered strong impacts after floods. Despite a higher human development index and low levels of poverty, Santa Catarina suffered more deaths than Pernambuco. Altogether, results demonstrate the need to include public health issues in all steps of disaster risk management.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Londe, L. de R., Marchezini, V., da Conceição, R. S., Bortoletto, K. C., Silva, A. E. P., dos Santos, E. V., & Reani, R. T. (2015). Impactos de desastres socioambientais em saúde pública: Estudos dos casos dos Estados de Santa Catarina em 2008 e Pernambuco em 2010. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Populacao, 32(3), 537–562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-3098201500000031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free