Can arthroscopic revision surgery for shoulder instability be a fair option?

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of arthroscopic capsuloplasty in the treatment of failed primary arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability. Methods: we retrospectively examined at a minimum of 3-years follow-up 22 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment between 1999 and 2007 who had recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a post-surgical failure. A statistical analysis was performed to evaluate which variable could influence the definitive result and clinical outcomes at final follow-up. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: we observed after revision surgery an overall failure rate of 8/22 (36.4%) including frank dislocations, subluxations and also apprehension that seriously inhibit the patient's quality of life. No significant differences were observed in the examined parameters. Conclusions: according to our outcomes we generally do not recommend an arthroscopic revision procedure for failed instability surgery. © CIC Edizioni Internazionali.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Giorgi, S., Garofalo, R., Tafuri, S., Cesari, E., Delle Rose, G., & Castagna, A. (2014). Can arthroscopic revision surgery for shoulder instability be a fair option? Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 4(2), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.11138/mltj/2014.4.2.226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free