Comparative study on the determination of heavy metals in soil by XRF and ICP-MS

13Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The contents of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cd in standard soil for composition (GBW07403) and two soil samples were determined by XRF and ICP-MS, respectively. The results showed that XRF had higher precision than ICP-MS in the determination of seven metals in standard soil, but the relative errors of Ni, As and Cd were larger, up to -33%∼22.7%. XRF and ICP-MS were used to determine contents of seven kinds of heavy metals in 2 soil samples, respectively. Both methods had high precision. F test showed that there was no significant difference in precision between the two methods except for Cd in No. 2 soil. The t test showed that there were significant differences by the two methods for the determination of other heavy metals except for Cd and Cu (P ≤0.05). Although the method of XRF was fast and simple, its accuracy and comparison with other experimental methods need to be further studied due to the sample matrix effect.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, W., Niu, N., Guo, N., Zhou, H., Bu, J., & Ding, A. (2021). Comparative study on the determination of heavy metals in soil by XRF and ICP-MS. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2009). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2009/1/012075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free