Realistic Evaluation of a Rapid Response System: Context, Mechanisms, and Outcomes

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe and explore differences between rapid response system events in a Midwestern community hospital through context, mechanism, and outcome factors. The design was a retrospective review of 1,939 adult inpatient events that occurred on medical (62.8%) and surgical units (37.2%) over 92 months. The immediate outcomes of the events were stabilization (59.0%), transfer to a higher level of care (39%), and cardiopulmonary arrest (2%). Nurses activated 94% of all rapid response events; respiratory (38.8%) and cardiac (29.2%) symptoms were the most common triggers, and worry alone triggered 23% of all events. Medical and surgical events were significantly different with regard to antecedents to unit arrival, most common triggers, immediate clinical outcomes, and occurrence during resource-limited times. Understanding rapid response events and differences between medical and surgical units is important to improve early identification of deterioration and thus intervention for vulnerable patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bunch, J. L., Groves, P. S., & Perkhounkova, Y. (2019, April 1). Realistic Evaluation of a Rapid Response System: Context, Mechanisms, and Outcomes. Western Journal of Nursing Research. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945918776310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free