Proposed carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) cut-off values for the detection of pancreatic cancer in patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a real-world study

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CA19-9 is a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer (PC), and the nondiabetic cut-off level is 37 U/mL. CA19-9 levels are said to rise in patients with tumors like PC and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). CA19-9 levels have also been shown to be related to HbA1c levels. We hypothesized that the CA19-9 cut-off levels would differ between patients with poorly controlled diabetes. This real-world trial was designed to test our hypotheses. This was a retrospective cohort study. All inpatients with poorly controlled diabetes had mean HbA1c levels of 10.0% and were divided into three groups: those with pancreatic cancer (PC group, N = 20), those with IPMN (IPMN group, N = 55), and those with neither (NC group, N = 985). Serum CA19-9 levels in the PC group were significantly higher than in the IPMN and NC groups (p < 0.001). CA19-9 levels did not differ statistically between the IPMN and NC groups. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, serum CA19-9 levels of 98.4 U/mL had the highest sensitivity and specificity to detect PC, when comparing PC to IPMN + NC groups. Using this cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity of CA19-9 for PC were 70.0% and 96.5%, respectively, with a 0.81 area under the ROC curve. CA19-9 levels in two inpatients were >98.4 U/mL, most likely due to hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal cancer. CA19-9 cut-off levels were thought to be 98.4 U/mL. However, we should keep in mind that the sensitivity and specificity were not 100%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yamada, T., Minami, T., Yamada, M., & Terauchi, Y. (2023). Proposed carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) cut-off values for the detection of pancreatic cancer in patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a real-world study. Endocrine Journal, 70(11), 1069–1075. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ23-0186

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free