The Cost-effectiveness of Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections

14Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Antimicrobial lock solutions are a low-cost strategy that can reduce the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial locks for the prevention of CLABSI. Methods. We constructed a decision-analytic model comparing antimicrobial lock solutions to heparin locks for the prevention of CLABSI in 3 settings: hemodialysis, cancer treatment, and home parenteral nutrition. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating CLABSIs prevented and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Uncertainty was addressed by plotting cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds. Results. In probabilistic analysis, at a willingness to pay of 50 000, antimicrobial lock solutions had a 96.24% chance of being cost-effective, compared with heparin locks in the hemodialysis setting, an 88.00% chance in the cancer treatment setting, and a 92.73% chance in the home parenteral nutrition setting. In base-case analysis, antimicrobial lock solutions resulted in savings of 68 721.03 for the hemodialysis setting, 85 061.41 for the cancer setting, and 78 513.83 for the home parenteral nutrition setting per CLABSI episode prevented. Conclusions. In 3 distinct and clinically important settings (hemodialysis, cancer treatment, and home parenteral nutrition), antimicrobial lock solutions are an effective strategy for the prevention of CLABSI, and their use can result in significant healthcare savings.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pliakos, E. E., Andreatos, N., Ziakas, P. D., & Mylonakis, E. (2019). The Cost-effectiveness of Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 68(3), 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free