Change in corneal hysteresis over time in normal, glaucomatous and diabetic eyes

34Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose Corneal hysteresis (CH) is lower in glaucomatous eyes. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the change in CH over time between normal, open angle glaucoma (POAG) and diabetic subjects. Methods We retrospectively analysed records of patients undergoing assessment with the Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert, Corp., New York, NY, USA). Right eyes with at least 7 measurements were included. Patients with ocular pathology other than POAG were excluded. Two-sample t-tests, chi-squared and logistic regression were used to analyse data. Results A total of 1418 normal and 322 POAG patients were included. Patients with POAG were significantly older (70.73 ± 11.33 vs. 61.59 ± 16.56 years; p < 0.001), had a longer follow-up (4.14 ± 1.34 vs. 2.72 ± 1.49 years; p < 0.001) and had lower CH (9.58 ± 2.17 vs. 9.95 ± 2.19 mmHg p = 0.01), but there were no gender differences between groups (61.5 vs. 57.7% female; p = 0.21). We observed a significantly greater decrease in CH among patients with POAG (-0.11 ± 0.73 vs. 0.07 ± 2.31 mm Hg/year; p = 0.02). The relation between δCH/year and diagnosis persisted after adjusting for age and follow-up time (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82, 0.99; p = 0.03). We found CH to be higher in diabetics vs. non-diabetics (10.34 ± 2.04 vs. 9.88 ± 2.19; p = 0.02), but δCH/year was not different (0.07 ± 1.27 vs. 0.03 ± 2.10; p = 0.77). Conclusions Patients with POAG in this study had a significantly greater rate of CH decline compared to normal. There was no significant difference in rate of CH change in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hussnain, S. A., Alsberge, J. B., Ehrlich, J. R., Shimmyo, M., & Radcliffe, N. M. (2015). Change in corneal hysteresis over time in normal, glaucomatous and diabetic eyes. Acta Ophthalmologica, 93(8), e627–e630. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12726

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free