Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities

63Citations
Citations of this article
243Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For public service organizations (PSOs) it is essential to be able to simultaneously optimize and innovate policies, processes and services. This article explores how PSOs shape these dual practices by examining optimization and innovation practices in eight Dutch regional water authorities (RWAs) using focus groups. It uncovers mutually reinforcing differences in culture, strategy and management leading to different ambidextrous configurations. In low ambidextrous RWAs a legalistic task-orientation goes along with a transactional management style and focus on optimization only. In high ambidextrous RWAs a societal value-orientation, integrative strategies, and a more transformational management style lead to more embedded innovation practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gieske, H., Duijn, M., & van Buuren, A. (2020). Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities. Public Management Review, 22(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free