Ludic Taunting: Does Taunting Work Differently in Video Games?

  • Purnomo S
  • Purnama S
  • Untari L
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Studies on taunting in video game context tend to mull over around how players taunt other players via online chat features. Studies on how taunting works in games with in-game taunt features are under investigated. Examining twenty-seven gamestory-wise and gameplay-wise games, we argue, through this sociolinguistic study, that taunting designed for game characters is better termed ludic taunting since it has different functions from that of taunting in games with online chat feature and in real life. Ludic taunting has two major functions namely narrative and mechanical. The former which refers to taunting for game story-bound purposes is classified into archetyping, cameoing, and mythopoesing. The latter, for game play-bound purposes, is classified into buffing, cosmeticizing, cueing, debuffing, hinting, and rewarding. Game designers and scholars could employ this study as a reference in designing games with in-game taunt features.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Purnomo, S. L. A., Purnama, SF. L. S., Untari, L., Wibowo, A. P., Aqib, N., & Oktaviana, Y. V. (2022). Ludic Taunting: Does Taunting Work Differently in Video Games? Journal of Language and Literature, 22(2), 466–480. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v22i2.4197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free