Fitosociología De Malezas Después De Un Cultivo De Papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) En Los Andes Venezolanos: Un Enfoque Agroecologico

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Weeds represent one problem for potato cultivation in the Venezuelan Andes; however ecological studies to improve their management are limited. This study has aimed to carry out a phytosociological survey of weed community after potato cultivation in Mérida, Mérida state, Venezuela. The experiment was carried out under a completely randomized design with 20 plots (2x2 m). The weeds surveys were conducted at two month intervals, randomly selecting five plots per session during June 2006 and February 2007, to 60 days after cultivation (DDC), 120, 180, and 240 DDC. The phytosociological survey was performed involving identification and quantification of numbers of individuals the weeds in each plot. After were estimated of phytosociological parameters such as density, frequency, abundance to calculate the importance value index. A multivariate non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was performed using species abundances; also was used the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) with presence absence data. Seventeen families, 32 genera and 35 species of weeds were identified, with the Asteraceae, Fabaceae and Poaceae families showed higher importance within the community. The most important species in the all stages were Pennisetum clandestinum, Paspalum decumbens, Desmodium adscendens, Aldama dentata, Borreria laevis, and Jaegeria hirta. Significant differences in phytosociological parameters were observed among weed species at each stage and among the different stages after potato cultivation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Villa, P. M., Rodrigues, A. C., Márquez, N., Rodrigues, A. L., & Martins, S. V. (2017). Fitosociología De Malezas Después De Un Cultivo De Papa (Solanum tuberosum L.) En Los Andes Venezolanos: Un Enfoque Agroecologico. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 20(2), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2352

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free