Risk of incremental toxicities and associated costs of new anticancer drugs: A meta-analysis

68Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: There are increasing reports of rare but serious toxicities caused by new anticancer drugs, and there are costs associated with their management. Methods: We identified anticancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 2000 to 2011 and pivotal trials supporting their registration. Twelve frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event (AEs) were weighted and pooled in a meta-analysis. Estimates of incremental drug prices and ncremental costs for management of AEs were calculated according to type of new agent based on target specificity. Results: We identified 41 studies comprising 27, 539 patients and evaluating 19 experimental drugs. Agents directed against a specific molecular target on cancer cells had a lower incidence of grade 3 to 4 toxicities compared with controls (median risk ratio [RR], 0. 67; P =. 22), whereas less-specific targeted agents, including angiogenesis inhibitors (median RR, 3. 39; P < 001). Median incremental drug price for experimental agents was $6, 000 per patient per month Median cost of managing toxicity was low compared with drug costs but higher than controls for treatment with less-specific targeted agents and chemotherapies. Conclusion: Newly approved anticancer drugs are associated with increased toxicity, except for agents with a specific molecular target on cancer cells. Management of toxicity leads to a small increase in overall cost of treatment. Frequency of toxicity and associated costs are likely higher in less-selected patients treated in general oncologic practice. Development of biomarker-driven agents should be encouraged.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Niraula, S., Amir, E., Vera-Badillo, F., Seruga, B., Ocana, A., & Tannock, I. F. (2014). Risk of incremental toxicities and associated costs of new anticancer drugs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(32), 3634–3642. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.8437

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free