A Review of the Academic Debate about United Nations Security Council Reform

  • Winther B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article outlines and discusses the research on UNSC reform. The interdisciplinary field of UNSC reform research can be placed into two broad categories and four sub categories, each indicating the degree to which scholars believe in the benefits of either structural or working methods reform. These include topics such as legitimacy and efficiency and the question of (un)equal representation. The role of The Global South will feature heavily in analyses of how best to reform the UNSC , and of which actors or structures mainly prevent a reform from materialising. There has been a significant gap in research focusing on how the factors that feature as instruments of opposition, e.g. the presented benefits and detriments of the different approaches to reform, can potentially be converged to rethink the direction of the research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winther, B. Z. (2020). A Review of the Academic Debate about United Nations Security Council Reform. The Chinese Journal of Global Governance, 6(1), 71–101. https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free