High Obstetric Risk Consultation, march 2020-2021, at the Hospital Universitario Jesus Maria Casal Ramos: a necessity during the pandemic.

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outpatient activities of high obstetric risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Retrospective, descriptive review of epidemiological, clinical/paraclinical factors and treatment of 102 medical records from the High Obstetric Risk clinic of the Jesus Maria Casal Ramos Araure/Acarigua University Hospital from March 11, 2020 to March 11, 2021. Results: In the year, 346 controls were carried out, 244 successive controls, 23% adolescents, 19% elderly and 58% of reproductive age; 77% with some degree of formal education; 57% of the municipality of Araure, the most common reason for referral in 25% want not to reproduce and 23% in previous cesarean sections; high blood pressure was the most frequent family and personal history and comorbidity; 64% had a lower average gain of 6 Kgs; 52% of patients were anemic on their exams, requiring iron supplements or transfusions; betamethasone was the most widely used inducer of lung maturation and amoxicillin/clavulanic antibiotic. 2 patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus, 1 primary syphilis and 2 COVID-19 were monitored and treated on an outpatient basis: 1 mild in the 1st trimester and 1 moderate in the 3rd trimester. There were no maternal deaths in the sample. Conclusion: The high obstetric risk consultation is the most effective form of articulation between the surrogate, the health services and the community that guarantees a healthy pregnancy, the place to give birth, as well as a dignified and respected treatment throughout the process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez, F. B., Aliaga, M. I., & Perez, N. M. (2022). High Obstetric Risk Consultation, march 2020-2021, at the Hospital Universitario Jesus Maria Casal Ramos: a necessity during the pandemic. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela, 82(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.51288/00820207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free