Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli?

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bacterial persistence to antibiotics defines the ability of small sub-populations of sensitive cells within an isogenic population to survive high doses of bactericidal antibiotics. Here, we investigated the importance of the five main envelope stress responses (ESRs) of Escherichia coli in persistence to five bactericidal β-lactam antibiotics by combining classical time-kill curve experiments and single-cell analysis using time-lapse microscopy. We showed that the survival frequency of mutants for the Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs systems treated with different β-lactams is comparable to that of the wild-type strain, indicating that these ESRs do not play a direct role in persistence to β-lactams. Since the σE-encoding gene is essential, we could not directly test its role. Using fluorescent reporters to monitor the activation of ESRs, we observed that σE is induced by high doses of meropenem. However, the dynamics of σE activation during meropenem treatment did not reveal any difference in persister cells compared to the bulk of the population, indicating that σE activation is not a hallmark of persistence. The Bae, Cpx, Psp, and Rcs responses were neither induced by ampicillin nor by meropenem. However, pre-induction of the Rcs system by polymyxin B increased survival to meropenem in an Rcs-dependent manner, suggesting that this ESR might confer some yet uncharacterized advantages during meropenem treatment or at the post-antibiotic recovery step. Altogether, our data suggest that ESRs are not key actors in E. coli persistence to β-lactams in the conditions we tested.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rousseau, C. J., Fraikin, N., Zedek, S., & Van Melderen, L. (2023). Are envelope stress responses essential for persistence to β-lactams in Escherichia coli? Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 67(10). https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00329-23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free