New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A statistical evaluation

255Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis have been evaluated. In a study of 412 subjects, clinical examination was carried out subjectively and objectively. Criterion evaluation was applied to both subjective and objective data. The following points emerged from the investigation: (a) No overall difference was found between subjective and objective results; (b) Calculated in terms of frequency of positive and false nagative tests, sensitivity, and the Youden index (sensitivity + specificity - 100), criteria were listed in the following order of value: (i) Thoraco lumbar pain, (ii) Limited chest expansion, (iii) Limited back movement. However, in terms of false positive tests and specificity, the reverse order was obtained. It was calculated that individual criteria in their present form fail to provide a satisfactory diagnostic index of ankylosing spondylitis. Thoraco lumbar pain is too sensitive and too non specific, and limited chest and back mobility are too insensitive and too specific. In order to obviate this problem it is suggested that criteria should be numerically weighted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moll, J. M. H., & Wright, V. (1973). New York clinical criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A statistical evaluation. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 32(4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.32.4.354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free