Tuning unemployment insurance to the business cycle

Abstract

Tuning unemployment insurance to the business cycle. IZA World of Labor 2014: 54 doi: 10.15185/izawol.54 | Torben M. Andersen © | May 2014 | wol.iza.org Pros The impact of unemployment insurance can be strengthened by improving its generosity in bad economic times, when the need is greatest. Making unemployment insurance less generous during good economic times can strengthen job-search incentives. Such flexible terms for unemployment insurance are consistent with balancing public budgets across the business cycle. Business cycle contingencies can be implemented within a rule-based system to ensure automatic adjustments that are in tune with the business cycle. eLeVATor PITCH High unemployment and its social and economic consequences have lent urgency to the question of how to improve unemployment insurance in bad times without jeopardizing incentives to work or public finances in the medium term. A possible solution is a rule-based system that improves the generosity of unemployment insurance (replacement rate, benefit duration, eligibility conditions) when unemployment is high and reduces the generosity when it is low. AUTHor's MAIn MessAGe Unemployment insurance can be made more flexible by tuning it to the level of economic activity. A flexible system provides more generous insurance when it is most needed, during periods of high unemployment, and strengthens the incentive structure by reducing benefit generosity when it is most harmful, during periods of low unemployment. Such a scheme can be rule-based, with automatic triggers and sunset clauses, and consistent with a fiscal budget balanced automatically over the business cycle. Cons There can be administrative difficulties in adjusting the unemployment system to the business cycle. Determining the trigger points to release changes in the system can be difficult. Important to calibrate the unemployment insurance system such that it does not conserve a high structural level of unemployment. There is a risk of political bias, implying asymmetric responses over the business cycle.