Co-culture of early cattle embryos to the blastocyst stage with oviducal tissue or in conditioned medium

435Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In Exp. 1, 5-8-cell embryos from superovulated cattle were co-cultured with oviducal tissue suspended in Ham's F10 + 10% fetal calf serum (F10FCS) or in F10FCS alone. After 4 days, the proportion of embryos developing into compact morulae or blastocysts was greater (P < 0.005) in co-culture (38/82; 46%) than in F10FCS (1/27; 4%). In Exp. 2, a solution of collagenase, trypsin, DNAse and EDTA was used to disperse oviducal tissue, which was then cultured in TCM199 + 10% fetal calf serum (M199FCS) to obtain monolayers. Embryos (1-8 cells) were then co-cultured with monolayers or in M199FCS alone. The proportion of embryos developing into compact morulae and blastocysts after 4-5 days was higher (P < 0.005) in co-culture (15/34; 43%) than in M199FCS (1/37; 3%); mean numbers of cells/embryo were also higher (P < 0.001) (27.70; range 2-82 in co-culture; 8.83; range 2-18 in M199FCS). In Exp. 3, embryos obtained from in-vitro maturation and fertilization were used to compare development between co-culture and medium conditioned by oviducal tissue. Initial cleavage rate (no. embryos > 1 cell/total) was 76% (611/807) and did not differ among treatments. After 5 days, the proportion cleaving to > 16 cells was higher (P < 0.005) in co-culture (71/203; 35%) and conditioned medium (48/205; 23%) compared to M199FCS (14/203; 7%). Similarly, the proportion developing into compact morulae and blastocysts was greater (P < 0.005) in co-culture (44/203; 22%) and conditioned medium (46/205; 22%) than in M199FCS (7/203; 3%). Developmental potential was tested in Exp. 4 by tranferring embryos to 11 recipients, of which 6 (55%) became pregnant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eyestone, W. H., & First, N. L. (1989). Co-culture of early cattle embryos to the blastocyst stage with oviducal tissue or in conditioned medium. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 85(2), 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0850715

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free