Comparison of efficacy of nortriptyline versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on painful peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes

3Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and aims: Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is one of the most common complications of diabetes and is difficult to treat. Existing treatments are often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side-effects and drug tolerance. This study assessed the efficacy of nortriptyline versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in patients with DPNP. Material and method: This is a randomized clinical trial study conducted on 39 patients with DPNP referring to Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz in 2017. Patients were randomly treated with TENS (18 sessions, each session 30 minutes; n=20) or nortriptyline (25 to 75 mg, once daily; n=19) for 6 weeks. Patients were evaluated for side effects and pain relief using visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There was a significant improvement in pain with both treatments compared with baseline (p≺0.001). The patients in nortriptyline group experienced more pain relief (7.21±1.51 to 0.84±1.34) than the TENS group (7.6±1.47 to 2.75 ±2.43) (P=0.001). The 50% pain relief was observed in 14 patients (73%) in nortriptyline group, 6 patients (30%) in TENS group. Moreover, the side effects were seen in 15% of TENS and 55% of patients in nortriptyline groups (P=0.019). Conclusion: Both TENS and nortriptyline were effective and safe in the management of DPNP. But nortriptyline showed a better performance on pain relief.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zakerkish, M., Raeisi, D., Rafie, S., Yazdi, M. J. S., Kosarian, Z., Telegrafchi, S. R., & Hesam, S. (2019). Comparison of efficacy of nortriptyline versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on painful peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Romanian Journal of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, 26(4), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjdnmd-2019-0043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free