A phase I-II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: A report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

45Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Gemcitabine and docetaxel have been claimed to be active single agents in advanced pancreatic cancer. We determined the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel combined with a weekly fixed dose of gemcitabine and assessed the activity of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods: Phase I. Patients were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every three weeks, at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m2; docetaxel was given at escalating doses starting from 70 mg/m2 on day 8. Phase II. In accord with the optimal two-stage phase II study design, 18 patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel (70 mg/m2). Results: Phase I. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the second dose level of docetaxel (80 mg/m2), with all three patients developing grades 3 or 4 neutropenia. Consequently, the dose tested in the phase II study was 70 mg/m2. Phase II. In the 18 patients enrolled in the study, we registered only one partial response. The time to progression was 3 months, and the median treatment survival was 5.4 months. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (three episodes) and thrombocytopenia (two episodes). Furthermore, 10 patients complained of grade 3 fatigue. Conclusions: The addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine does not appear to be useful in advanced pancreatic cancer, since gemcitabine alone achieves similar results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cascinu, S., Gasparini, G., Catalano, V., Silva, R. R., Pancera, G., Morabito, A., … Catalano, G. (1999). A phase I-II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: A report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Annals of Oncology, 10(11), 1377–1379. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008394111533

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free